Bank Not Liable for Failing To Disclose Environmental Issues At Foreclosure Sale

In Rhima v JPMorgan Chase Bank, 2012 U.S. Dist.LEXIS 70492 (N.D.Tx. 5/18/02), plaintiff was the successful bidder at a foreclosure auction for a warehouse property. The advertised terms and conditions of the foreclosure sale offer indicated that bidders would be provided with environmental reports and access to the property for inspection but the sale was […]

Bank Not Liable for Failing To Disclose Environmental Issues At Foreclosure Sale Read More »

Ct Grants Summary Judgment in Maryland Square Vapor Intrusion Case

We have been periodically posting updates on the progress of the landmark Voggenthaler v Maryland Square, LLC vapor intrusion case from Las Vegas, Nevada.  In the most recent ruling, the court granted the motion for summary judgment filed by the Nevada Department of Environmental Protection (NDEP) seeking cost recovery under CERCLA.  2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS

Ct Grants Summary Judgment in Maryland Square Vapor Intrusion Case Read More »

Non-Reliance Clause Bars Walk-Away Bidder From Recouping Diligence Costs

The Delaware Supreme Court ruled that a bidder that declined to proceed with a $170 million could not recover recoup $1.2 million in due diligence and negotiation costs. In RAA Management, LLC v. Savage Sports Holdings, Inc., 2012 Del. LEXIS 271 (Del. 5/18/12) , investment fund RAA Management (RAA) was invited by an investor bank

Non-Reliance Clause Bars Walk-Away Bidder From Recouping Diligence Costs Read More »

11th Circuit Affirms No Liability For Developer In Florida Bombing Range Case

The latest installment of our “Home on the Bombing Range” series takes us to Florida at the site of what is now known as the former World War 2 Pinecastle Bombing Range (PBR). Virgilio v. Ryland Group, Inc., 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 10094 (11th Cir. 5/18/12) is a class action lawsuit brought by purchasers of

11th Circuit Affirms No Liability For Developer In Florida Bombing Range Case Read More »

Consultant Not Liable to Residents of Housing Complex For Not Identifying Vapor Risks

A California state court dismissed a negligence claim brought against an environmental consultant by residents of the infamous Ujima Village low income housing complex for failing to identify health risks associated with a former oil storage facility. The 300-unit Ujima Village complex had been constructed on a portion of the former 122-acre Athens Tank Farm

Consultant Not Liable to Residents of Housing Complex For Not Identifying Vapor Risks Read More »

Bank Not Liable For Auction Sale of Contaminated Property

In Lusk v First Century Bank, 2012 W. Va. LEXIS 241 (Sup. Ct. 4/27/12), the plaintiff/petitioners purchased a commercial property at an auction foreclosure sale. The Notice of Trustee’s Sale and Regency’s advertising notice stated that the sale was subject to “environmental regulations” and that the property was being sold in an “as is” condition.

Bank Not Liable For Auction Sale of Contaminated Property Read More »

Freddie Mac Changes Radon and ACM Requirements for Multi-Family Phase 1 Reports

Earlier this year, Freddie Mac recently clarified its environmental requirements for phase 1 reports issued for multi-family loans. The two key changes involve radon and asbestos. Excerpts for these two issues are below. The full text of the revisions are available from the link at the bottom of this post. Radon- Freddie Mac now requires

Freddie Mac Changes Radon and ACM Requirements for Multi-Family Phase 1 Reports Read More »

Demystifying Environmental Investigations To Clients

One of the more daunting tasks of environmental consultants and lawyers is to explain the environmental investigation and remediation process to clients and the public. Part of the problem is that many business people do not have a strong science foundation and may not understand some of the issues associated with environmental contamination. In addition,

Demystifying Environmental Investigations To Clients Read More »