Corporate and Real Estate Transactions

Kiddie Kollege Ruling Highlights Importance of Performing PAs in NJ Transactions

Corporate and Real Estate Transactions, Environmental Due Diligence, NJ Spill Act / By

Nearly eight years after a New Jersey day care was forced to close down because of mercury contamination, the legal fallout continues.  In the latest legal salvo involving the infamous Kiddie Kollege Daycare & Preschool, Inc, (Kiddie Kollege), a New Jersey trial court ordered the current property owner who leased the contaminated building to the […]

Kiddie Kollege Ruling Highlights Importance of Performing PAs in NJ Transactions Read More »

Problems Emerge with New CREC Definition

Brownfields, CERCLA, consultant malpractice, Corporate and Real Estate Transactions, Environmental Due Diligence, Lender Liability, vapor intrusion / By

After a little more than six months after ASTM issued its new E1527-13 Phase 1 standard practice, problems are emerging over the new definition Controlled Recognized Environmental Condition (CREC) definition. The difficulties are related to the definition itself and differences among state environmental programs. Before discussing the CREC problems, a little background might be helpful

Problems Emerge with New CREC Definition Read More »

EPA Recognizes E1527-13 But Preamble Raises Specter of Retroactive LIability For Past Phase 1 Reports that Did Not Assess Vapor Intrusion

Brownfields, CERCLA, common law, consultant malpractice, Corporate and Real Estate Transactions, Environmental Due Diligence, vapor intrusion / By

On December 30th, the  federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final rule in the Federal Register  (78 FR 79319) recognizing the new ASTM E1527-13 phase 1 standard practice as an approved method for complying with the All Appropriate Inquires (AAI) rule. As explained below, while the preamble to the final rule is an improvement to

EPA Recognizes E1527-13 But Preamble Raises Specter of Retroactive LIability For Past Phase 1 Reports that Did Not Assess Vapor Intrusion Read More »

Bankruptcy Court Finds Kerr-McGee Engaged in Fraudulent Transfer in Tronox Spinoff

bankruptcy, Corporate and Real Estate Transactions, Disclosure of Environmental Liabilities, Environmental Due Diligence / By

[Updated to reflect April 3, 2014 settlement] In what may be one of the most significant cases involving the application of fraudulent conveyance laws and environmental liability, the bankruptcy court for the Southern District of New York held that Kerr-McGee had engaged in a fraudulent transfer when it spun off various assets in 2005 into

Bankruptcy Court Finds Kerr-McGee Engaged in Fraudulent Transfer in Tronox Spinoff Read More »

2nd Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Negligence Claim Agst Consultant

consultant malpractice, Corporate and Real Estate Transactions, Environmental Due Diligence / By

We have previously discussed Ridge Seneca Plaza, LLC v. BP Prods. North America, No. 6:06-cv-06333 (W.D.N.Y. 3/28/11) where the federal district case from the western district of New York ruled that a purchaser could not bring a malpractice claim against a consultant who had been retained by a bank. . We picked this case because it

2nd Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Negligence Claim Agst Consultant Read More »

CMBS Special Servicer May Not Recover VI Test Costs Under Environmental Indemnity

Corporate and Real Estate Transactions, Environmental Due Diligence, Lender Liability, vapor intrusion / By

Earlier this year, we discussed   the federal district ruling in Orix Capital Markets, LLC v Cadlerocks Centennial Drive, LLC, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48424 (D. Mass. 4/2/13) where a special servicer was allowed to pursue a guarantor despite the presence of an environmental insurance policy and was awarded over $100K in environmental investigation costs. This

CMBS Special Servicer May Not Recover VI Test Costs Under Environmental Indemnity Read More »

NYC OER To Issue Environmental Review and Assessment (ERA) letters

Brownfields, Corporate and Real Estate Transactions, Environmental Due Diligence, NYC OER / By

One of the key challenges facing purchasers of contaminated property is that the Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser, Contiguous Property Owner and Innocent Purchaser liability protections that are available under the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund) and similar state laws are self implementing. While EPA may occasionally enter into a

NYC OER To Issue Environmental Review and Assessment (ERA) letters Read More »

New York’s Quirky Rules for Heating Oil Storage Tanks

Corporate and Real Estate Transactions, Environmental Due Diligence, Navigation Law, oil spills, Underground Storage Tanks / By

Storage tanks used for the storage of heating oil for on-site consumptive use are excluded from federal underground storage tank (UST) program.  However, a number states including New York regulate heating oil tanks. There are approximately 3 million residential heating oil tanks in New York State. While home heating oil tanks for single family homes

New York’s Quirky Rules for Heating Oil Storage Tanks Read More »

NYSDEC Proposes Changes to Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Storage Tank Regs

Corporate and Real Estate Transactions, Navigation Law, oil spills, Underground Storage Tanks / By

During the summer, NYSDEC issued draft revised regulations to its Petroleum Bulk Storage (PBS), the Major Oil Storage Facility (MOSF) program and the Chemical Bulk Storage (CBS) program. The revisions are intended to make the PBS and CBS regulations consistent with the federal underground storage (UST) regulations codified at 40 CFR Part 280 so that

NYSDEC Proposes Changes to Petroleum and Hazardous Substance Storage Tank Regs Read More »

Should Consultants Use ASTM E1527-13 Prior to EPA Recognition?

CERCLA, Corporate and Real Estate Transactions, Environmental Due Diligence / By

On November 6th, ASTM announced that it has published its E1527-13 Phase 1 Standard for Environmental Site Assessments. Upon publication of a new ASTM standard, the prior version becomes obsolete. In a normal transition, environmental consultants would transition to using the new E1527 version like they did with the E1527-94, E1527-97 and E1527-00. However, this is not

Should Consultants Use ASTM E1527-13 Prior to EPA Recognition? Read More »

Scroll to Top