oil spills

Statute of Limitations Bars Purchaser’s Claim For 1981 Pipeline Spill

In Carolyn Vickers Inc. v. Unocal Corp., 2011 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 9642 (Ct. App-2nd Dist. 12/19/11), Alan Little Ventures (ALV) purchased a 4.1 acre tract of land in San Luis Obispo in 2005. The land had been subdivided into 17 lots by the sellers, Phyllis and Alex Madonna (the “Madonnas”), and was zoned for […]

Statute of Limitations Bars Purchaser’s Claim For 1981 Pipeline Spill Read More »

California Appeals Court Rules Reopening of NFA Letter Does Not Trigger Contractual Indemnification

Anyone who has negotiated the purchase of a gas station is aware that these agreements are incredibly complex. The contracts have dense definitions, dependent and inter-related provisions, and grant broad discretion to the sellers in determining the scope and conduct of the cleanup. A buyer who does not retain an environmental attorney who has previously

California Appeals Court Rules Reopening of NFA Letter Does Not Trigger Contractual Indemnification Read More »

5th Circuit Says OPA Third Party Defense Does Not Apply to Indirect Fueling Arrangements

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently had the opportunity to explore the scope of the Oil Pollution Act (OPA) third party defense  in Buffalo Marine Services, Inc. v. United States, 663 F.3d 750 (5th Cir. 2011). While the OPA third party defense set forth at set forth at 33 U.S.C.S.

5th Circuit Says OPA Third Party Defense Does Not Apply to Indirect Fueling Arrangements Read More »

Abandoned USTs Continue To Haunt Landlords With Old Leases

Many commercial properties are subject to old leases that were originally negotiated prior to the advent of environmental laws. These leases not only do not address environmental issues but also may contain clauses that can create liability for landlords when the property contains USTs. One of the more problematic clauses in old leases are those

Abandoned USTs Continue To Haunt Landlords With Old Leases Read More »

Court Interprets Scope of Indemnity Clauses Involving Deepwater Horizon Gulf Oil Spill

As the trial date for the sprawling Deepwater Horizon Gulf Oil Spill litigation date rapidly approaches, the federal district court has been busy issuing decisions to help refine the issues. Two of these opinion involved interpreting the scope of contractual indemnities-one of our favorite topics. The first opinion involved cross-motions for partial summary judgment filed

Court Interprets Scope of Indemnity Clauses Involving Deepwater Horizon Gulf Oil Spill Read More »

NY Ct Says Former Tenant Liable For Abandoned Tanks As Trade Fixtures

Federal and state underground storage tank (UST) programs impose closure obligations on the owners or operators of USTs that are taken out of service. If the tanks are to be inactive for a short period of time (the time period varies depending on the state), the tanks must comply with temporary closure requirements. Owners or

NY Ct Says Former Tenant Liable For Abandoned Tanks As Trade Fixtures Read More »

Tenant Not Liable For Inactive UST Shared With Adjacent Property

We have discussed in prior posts that New York courts have broadly construed the definition of a “discharger” under the New York Navigation Law. Even owners of property with inactive underground storage tanks (USTs) have been held liable as “dischargers” despite the fact they may have not known about the tank much less exercised any

Tenant Not Liable For Inactive UST Shared With Adjacent Property Read More »

Why Property Owners Should Consult Lawyers Before Signing Gas Leases

We have been sharing and commenting on articles discussing how lenders are becoming increasingly concerned about borrowers who lease their property to allow hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”). The operations permitted by the leases on what is typically rural or agricultural land include storage of hazardous substances and wastewater that likely would constitute defaults under the mortgages.

Why Property Owners Should Consult Lawyers Before Signing Gas Leases Read More »

New Damages Trial Ordered For Vapor Intrusion

In Sunrise Harbor Realty LLC v 35th Sunrise Corp, 2011 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5834 (App. Div-2nd Dept 7/12/11), the plaintiff owned a commercial building in Copiague, New York. The plaintiff contemplated purchasing the adjacent property that contained a gas station to expand its building. A phase 2 detected petroleum-contaminated groundwater migrating onto the plaintiff

New Damages Trial Ordered For Vapor Intrusion Read More »

Scroll to Top